The diary of a priest, being random thoughts and various things of possible interest from the Pastor of Our Lady of the Atonement Church in San Antonio, Texas.
20 October 2009
Questions, questions...
What a day it's been. I'm still trying to get my mind around just how historic and consequential this Apostolic Constitution will be. I've had lots of calls, emails and visits. I've talked with the media, with other Anglican Use clergy, and with many parishioners. There's plenty of excitement, and lots of questions. Nothing can be answered in any definitive way until the Apostolic Constitution is promulgated. Of course, that doesn't stop any of us from trying to figure it all out, right?
I've been asked how this idea of a Personal Ordinariate is different from what we already have in the Pastoral Provision. Here's an imperfect analogy: it's kind of like the difference between living in an apartment and living in a house. What do I mean? As things are now, we have a wonderful home in the Catholic Church. We have a beautiful liturgy. We have a marvellous church and school. We have a terrific archbishop who readily expresses his respect and affection for us. We're extremely fortunate. That's not the case in many other dioceses. There are bishops who have made it clear that they don't want an Anglican Use parish in their jurisdiction, and there have been many cases where requests have been flatly refused. Many chancery officials view the Pastoral Provision as being temporary, and will do very little to assist Anglican clergy and they completely ignore the inquiries of Anglican laity. As it is now, the Anglican Use depends upon the charity of the local ordinary. That's a very shaky foundation for building anything permanent. A landlord can eventually get rid of an unwanted tenant. A home-owner has a whole lot more stability.
When an Ordinariate is erected, it becomes (in every important way) like a diocese, with its own prelate, its own clergy and its own laity. As a juridical person, it owns property. While there must be cooperation with other bishops, the existence of the parishes of the Ordinariate won't depend on someone else's permission or good will. The prelate will determine when a new outreach should take place, and where a parish should be erected. The training and ordination of clergy will be coordinated within the Ordinariate, and their assignments will be directed by the prelate. All this contributes to a stability and permanence which will lead to further growth and effectiveness.
Some people have asked, "What about our beautiful liturgy? Will that change?" Actually, it probably will -- and for the better. The present Book of Divine Worship, while it's a thing of beauty and is far more than we expected at the time, isn't completely satisfactory. The liturgical politics of twenty-five years ago meant that we were required to "novus ordo-ize" parts of the Mass. Too much was incorporated from the 1979 Prayer Book, which is not the version most of us knew and loved. Many of us had come from what were called "Missal parishes," where we used things like the Anglican Missal, the English Missal, or the Knott Missal. These were beautiful expressions of the traditional Catholic Mass, in impeccable English, incorporating the Prayer Book along with traditional and ancient Catholic elements. Many of the Anglicans who will enter the Church through the Personal Ordinariates come from those same kind of parishes, and will be looking for that kind of liturgy. The Book of Divine Worship serves us well, but it needs to be amplified and improved. It's my hope that this will happen now.
We'll know lots more when the Apostolic Constitution is promulgated. How long before that happens, we don't know. But the Holy Father won't take more time than is necessary. Until then, we'll keep talking and asking questions and filling the space with what we think might happen.
The whole thing is just fantastic, and quite honestly, I never thought I'd live to see this day. Deo gratias.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

11 comments:
I think your example of moving from an aprtment to a house is great
Father:
I love playing the speculation game and realize that we won’t really know until we get to see the Apostolic Constitution (and maybe not even then), but I was wondering whether you thought that the personal ordinariates might lead to a situation where the Anglican Communion had a relationship with Rome similar to the Malkite or Maronite churches? I know that those churches maintain their own ordinarys outside the normal diocesan lines. This strikes me as being very different from the pastoral provision which provides for the offering of mass under a different rite, but within the structure established for the normal Roman Catholic diocesan practice….sort of like the Tridentine rite that is offered in some parish churches. What are your thoughts on this?
Father,
I must say, I have a few questions: are those of us already in the Pastoral Provision churches going to be moving into this new "house"? And who is going to chrismate our children when they come of age, if the ordinary is a presbyter? And while we would be greatly happy to have you as our ordinary, I must say that we Catholics are rather symbolic people: we must have a bishop, even if not for the functional reasons, at least for the symbolic ones, since a bishop not only has all the pastoral and teaching authority of the apostles, but almost as important, he represents in physical form to us the role the Church has as Guardian and Teacher of the doctrine handed down to us from Christ through the apostles, and Shepherd against the wolves of heresy and schism. Hopefully, the Church is not going to cut us off, then, so to speak, entirely from the ordinary of the territorial diocese?
Deo gratias! Exciting news!
It's a real shame to hear that the Anglican Use has gotten a cold reception in many places, sounds similar to the problems requests to have an EF Mass often face.
Could this mean that existing Anglican Use parishes (such as yours) "transfer" to a Personal Ordinariate?
Father, I am rejoicing for & with my fellow former Anglicans (and future former Anglicans). I am overwhelmed with the generosity of our Holy Father. He truly desires that "we all may be one," and I pray that lots more "fence-sitters" will respond to this offer.
One question I am still mulling over is how this might effect regular Latin Rite churches in solidly orthodox dioceses such as mine. Will this have the effect of siphoning off Anglican converts (and their love of beauty in liturgy), and thereby stunt the progress of "the reform of the reform"? No doubt the Holy See has already considered this. As you say, it's all speculation until the Constitution is actually promulgated.
Deo gratias, indeed!
What an exciting time to be part of the Anglican Use community!
Pax et Bonum,
Friar Rex
Little Portion Hermitage
There is a very interesting discussion about the Anglican Use liturgy on The Catholic Knight blog...
http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2009/10/anglican-use-liturgy-should-become.html
It concerns one possible future for the Anglican Use that surpasses all of our expectations. Check it out!
Paul, don't worry -- I certainly won't be the prelate. God has me exactly where he wants me. However, if the prelate is a priest, we would do as was quite common in the Military Ordinariate, and call upon the local Catholic bishop for sacramental ministry. Being part of a Personal Ordinariate doesn't mean that we would cut all ties to the rest of the local Church. I would imagine we would need access to the local Tribunal, School Office, etc., too.
Orate -- yes, the expectation would be that our existing parishes and communities would be integrated into the Ordinariate.
Fr Phillips,
Do that many parishes really use the Knott/Anglican Missal?
Greg Hessel in Arlington Diocese
I have seen many posts that suggest that in England the Anglo Catholics use the Novus Ordo, that whatever Use will be used should just be the same as that will unite the former Anglicans to the Catholic Church, rather than a more Anglican style of the Mass. Also that they replace Cramer's confession with what is used in Latin Rite parishes. I would like to know if Fr. Phillips thinks that the Anglican Use Mass will be completely changed into something more in line with the NO Mass? From what I have seen the canon used for the prayer of consecration at OLA is much more in line with the Sarum Use than the Latin Rite Use. I just have concerns that because the Anglicans in England use the NO they will not want to have a liturgy in line with OLA's or even the Anglican Missal.
When will be be able to know what is in the works for a new liturgy and will Anglican Use priests have any input into what is the final choice.
All things being equal, how many Anglican/Episcopal parishes will actually take advantage of this opportunity? There are still A/E's who won't want to have reunion with Rome except on THEIR terms.
Anglicans are a funny bunch. I have already read grumblings that they won't accept the BDW or feel they need conditional ordination, etc. A lot to work through.
If they are truly sincere then there will be little problem.
As for the effect on the Roman Rite proper, I think it will accelerate the Reform of the Reform and the use of the EF for those who want it it. It may also restore the older monastic liturgical rites. Most people today don't know that prior to Trent there were many different 'Uses' in the Latin West. It was always Rome's way or no way, liturgically speaking.
Another positive I see after the new AC is released, it will stop the protesting Bishops in there tracks. They will have to follow what is provided. They may try to hinder its implementation but that just reveals them as the ones who the Pope can then replace at the opportune time with someone more loyal to the church.
It will reset the battlelines.
Many Years!
Post a Comment