18 May 2009

You can fool some of the people all of the time...

Here's an excellent article which appears in the Weekly Standard.

Duped at Notre Dame
Barack Obama says he wants abortion to be safe, legal, and rare, while doing everything in his power to advance it.

by Paul Kengor
5/18/2009 11:15:00 AM

For a long time in America, the Religious Left, Catholics and Protestants alike, have been duped, played like fiddles. It happened again at Notre Dame yesterday.

President Barack Obama received an honorary degree amid a firestorm of controversy generated by his unprecedented extremism on abortion--an issue where he stands further to the left than any president in history, and in crystal-clear opposition to core Catholic Church social-moral teaching. Not one to back down, Obama addressed the matter head on at Notre Dame, feeding the faithful the left's standard abortion canard. He explained that he wants to "reduce the number of women seeking abortions."

This should have elicited gasps from an educated audience. After all, one of Obama's first acts as president--on January 23, the day after the annual March for Life in Washington--was signing the Mexico City policy. That means that groups like International Planned Parenthood will be subsidized with taxpayer dollars to perform and promote abortion overseas--to vigorously push for legalization, at all stages of pregnancy, in countries that have banned the procedure. Under relentless assault are nations like Mexico itself, home of Our Lady of Guadalupe, an image every faithful Catholic knows.

This unique form of American "foreign aid" was notably excluded from President John Jenkins' reverential statement glorifying Obama's commitment to human rights.

Recall, too, that on March 9, only a few weeks after rescinding the Mexico City policy, Obama authorized federal dollars to promote the deliberate destruction of human life at its earliest stage of development (as embryos) for research purposes. To borrow from Pope John Paul II, the state will thus deny its unborn this "first of freedoms," this most fundamental freedom, from which there can be no other freedoms--with your tax dollars.

Yes, yes. And so the crowd, en masse, let out a collective gasp, right? No.

When President Obama declared that his goal is to reduce abortions, the "social-justice" Catholics at Notre Dame clapped and cheered.

They were taken--hook, line, and sinker.

As I struggled to absorb this bewildering spectacle, I tried to think of a scenario more absurd. I thought of other presidents who spoke at Notre Dame: George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter. Obama's speech came close to one of his predecessors--Reagan--but only by reversing the terms; and then the absurdities snowballed into an avalanche.
Reagan, coincidentally, did Notre Dame's commencement the exact same day, on May 17, in 1981. It was one of his finest speeches, written by a Catholic speechwriter, Tony Dolan. It is most remembered for this passage:


The years ahead are great ones for this country, for the cause of freedom and the spread of civilization. The West won't contain communism, it will transcend communism.... It will dismiss it as some bizarre chapter in human history whose last pages are even now being written.

It was one of Reagan's first presidential predictions of communism's demise, and a prophetic one, dismissed by elites. Indeed, those last pages were being written, though no one else sensed or said it. Communism would not survive the decade.

It was a stunning declaration, both at the time and especially in retrospect. Notre Dame's graduates were treated with a historical gem, a truly special send-off. They witnessed a statement they now understand was profound.

And that was for reasons beyond that declaration, as Reagan challenged the graduating seniors to join him in this great cause. He drew on remarks by Churchill during the Battle of Britain: "When great causes are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits, not animals, and that something is going on in space and time, and beyond space and time, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."

To Reagan, their shared duty was to fight expansionistic, atheistic Marxism. Were they worthy of that challenge? He hammered home the theme with other quotes and metaphors, including a personal story from his movie, Knute Rockne, All-American.

Think of all this in light of Obama's comments. In Obama's speech at Notre Dame, the salient issue was abortion. For Reagan, it was communism. But unlike Obama with abortion, Reagan spoke with moral clarity--with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, as Lincoln once said--and then proceeded to do everything he could to halt the evil of communism, to reverse it, to stem the tide.

As Ronald Reagan spoke that day, he was laying out a multi-layered assault to win the Cold War, done through a group of key advisers: Bill Clark, Bill Casey, Cap Weinberger, Ed Meese, Jean Kirkpatrick, Richard Pipes. There was economic warfare. There was the aiding of rebels and freedom fighters from Poland to Afghanistan to Nicaragua. There was a rhetorical war to expose the inherent immorality of the Soviet system. There were crucial alliances, with Margaret Thatcher, with Pope John Paul II. There was peace through strength, from the 600-ship Navy to Pershing IIs to SDI. There were actual, official NSDDs, produced under Bill Clark's tutelage at the NSC, which articulated a formal policy of undermining Soviet communism and bringing "political pluralism" to Eastern Europe and the USSR itself.

My point with these examples--which is far from a comprehensive list--is that when Ronald Reagan spoke at Notre Dame on May 17, 1981, he was deadly serious about pursuing a course that would seek to achieve the goal he set forth in the speech: to dispatch communism to the ash-heap of history.

For Barack Obama, on the other hand, there is no such list for the goal that he articulated on abortion. Quite the contrary, beginning with his co-sponsorship of the so-called Freedom of Choice Act--which would abolish most of the few restrictions on abortion--or with promises he made to Planned Parenthood in July 2007 to require abortion coverage in his national health care plan--or, earlier, votes against the Born Alive Infants' Protection Act as a state senator in Illinois--Obama has done, or has promised to do, many things that would radically expand abortion to levels where it has never gone before in American history.

In a July 2007 speech, Obama described Planned Parenthood as a "safety-net provider." He believes that abortion services constitute a "safety net," and views abortion as a fundamental human right, one that he would like to sanctify with taxpayer funding. If Barack Obama got everything he ever wanted on abortion, we would face taxpayer funding of unlimited, unrestricted abortion at all stages of pregnancy at home and abroad.

That would not reduce the number of abortions.

Like many pro-choice politicians, Barack Obama says he wants abortion to be safe, legal, and rare, while doing everything in his power to advance it. He pays lip service to these canards when he needs political cover. Not surprisingly, that's what he did at Notre Dame on Sunday. Shame on Father Jenkins, the trustees, and the faculty, for giving Obama a podium--and honorary degree--to make fools of a sea of undergraduates at America's most celebrated Catholic college.
It would be like Ronald Reagan at Notre Dame saying that he wanted to take down Soviet communism while simultaneously subsidizing it with taxpayer dollars throughout Eastern Europe and the USSR. It would be like Reagan calling on Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall while sending in cement trucks and rolls of barbed wire.

What was done by the American president at Notre Dame on May 17, 2009, as opposed to what was done by the American president at Notre Dame on May 17, 1981, was not fact but farce, not history but dupery. And yet again, the Religious Left has offered up itself in the ignominious role of sucker.

Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College. His latest books include The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism (HarperPerennial, 2007) and The Judge: William P. Clark, Ronald Reagan's Top Hand (Ignatius Press, 2007).

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think that it is interesting to note that both President Obama and Father Jenkins (Notre Dame University President) called on us all to engage in a “civil dialogue with mutual respect” on the issue of abortion. It is interesting because it forces us to consider what our response should be to something that is morally evil. I wonder whether President Obama could engage in a civil dialogue with mutual respect for someone who advocated slavery and the slave trade or who advocated genocide. I think that he would not. The overwhelming majority of people accept slavery and genocide as morally evil. Mutual respect requires both parties to recognize that each party has some justification for their position. What type of respect can be given to a party that takes a position that is morally evil? The anti-slavery movement brought this point home forcefully by using a button depicting a slave in chains and the motto “Am I not your brother?” Perhaps the pro-life movement should adopt a similar button with a picture of a fetus and the motto “Am I not your son or daughter?” More and more Americans are coming to the realization that a fetus is more than a collection of cells – it is a human life. With that realization comes the recognition that unnecessarily ending a human life is morally evil. Unfortunately, neither President Obama, nor apparently Father Jenkins, seems to understand all of the implications that entails. I am not suggesting that civil dialogue is not appropriate. All of the best logic is on the side of the pro-life movement and we should use it to continue to convert the hearts and minds of the American people. But we should always remember that we are debating with evil. And we should be very careful never to honor that evil.

Fr. Christopher G. Phillips said...

Very well stated, anonymous.

Afro Seminarian said...

"But we should always remember that we are debating with evil. And we should be very careful never to honor that evil" ooh thanks for calling out our president as evil.
On some level, this is not being civil. We have demonized our president to a point where we really dont want to listen.I find it amazing how we would bring up the slavery argument, yet have not done anything on those lines to elleminate the slave trade that is still going on in this world.

Abortion needs to be stopped. However, deminizing our president will not stop a practice that has been going on for a very long time.

Anonymous said...

He's demonized himself in failing to protect the unborn and passing laws that harm life in it's most vulnerable stage.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the ultimate irony to this whole thing, and one that is getting very little coverage in the press, is that this Catholic university chose to arrest one man, Dr. Alan Keyes, for protesting abortion by pushing a baby stroller with a doll covered in simulated blood across a lawn on the campus, while it chose to honor, by bestowing an honorary doctorate degree, on another man, President Obama, who has long advocated the broadest use of abortion and who, as president, has used his vast authority to open the federal coffers to fund abortion and embryonic stem cell research, not only in our country, but around the world. What conclusion should the average person draw from this about Notre Dame’s values and priorities?

Sandra G said...

"it forces us to consider what our response should be to something that is morally evil" "The overwhelming majority of people accept slavery and genocide as morally evil."

I would interpret Anonymous's remarks as referring to the position, that is, to something, not someone, that is evil. If we cannot call a position right or wrong, evil or good, then we cannot have a dialogue.
Obama may be well-educated and certainly far more educated than Sojourner Truth, but that dear lady had wisdom and moral goodness on her side. I can't think but that she would be ashamed of him for spilling the little pint of potentiality that the unborn have.

gray said...

I am saddened by the lack of humility and self reflection on this site.

You celebrate Reagans vision about communism, yet you say nothing of the financial crisis he layed the foundation for with his buy now pay later culture he set up. Why did Reagan take off the solar panels that Carter put on the White House? You don't mention his support for the death penalty or Apartheid South Africa, my country.

I think Christ reflected a life that is diametrically opposed to capitalism, yet in your understandable opposition to communism do you mention this? Your Church has become a refuge for those who seek a shield from the guilt of their wealth. What would St. Francis say here. Very sad.

You think you live by an absolute power, an absolute truth? So when is it permitted to take a life? To torture? To punish? To assasinate?

You portray a world where there are easy, simple answers, but you make the case by blinkers.

This site is partisan in an insiduous way, under a veil disguised as spiritual. Hypocrites. I suspect the humble person who admits their shortcommings in a dialogue with God is closest to Him.

Anonymous said...

Oh, well, you just can't quit criticizing! It must wrench your soul to say anything nice about anyone who doesn't see it your way 100%. Your are the judge, just in case anyone has any doubts.

Let's see the culture of life vs. the culture of death. Dubya sent 152 souls to their deaths during his time as governor of Texas, more than any other governor of any state in the history of the USA! But, gee, they didn't count because they were beyond redemption...just get rid of them!

This site sadly, speaks out of both sides of his mouth!!!

gray said...

Let's see the culture of life vs. the culture of death.

I have no idea what Anonymous is trying to say here. Can someone please clarify.

Norah said...

Father, the red font on brown background is impossible to read, for me at least.